Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedrolia Martin Sikayun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Pedrolia Martin Sikayun

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability. Questionable tier 1 apperance in international soccer match and none of these athletes compete(d) in a professional league as determined by WP:Football Note all these articles are created by SVG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Also nominating:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - some of these players have full internationals, such as Norsuriani Mazli, Usliza Usman, Jaciah Jumilis, Luisa Marques, Nurul Hamira Yusma Mohd Yusri, and Engracia Fernandes all in a single match last year ] as part of the 2016 AFF Women's Championship. I recommend cancelling this AFD, researching the players properly, and listing any remaining players separately. Nfitz (talk) 19:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 'The notability of these is accepted as they would have received significant coverage as outlined above in the general notability criteria." - Please demonstrate how each of these articles have received significant coverage. All of these fail part 2 of notability set by WP:Football and thuse should be deleted. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Many (if not all) meet part 1, so part 2 is not relevant. Part 1 explicitly says 'Players who have played in, and managers who have managed in any Tier 1 International Match ... are notable'. You are violating a long-standing consensus. Nfitz (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The notability guideline could be a lot more expansive on what a Tier 1 int'l match is. But if AFF Women's Championship is actually "Tier 1," then this nomination just isn't going to succeed, as WP:NFOOTBALL clearly states that just criterion 1 would be enough. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * One would hope that everyone editing in this topic area, is aware of what the FIFA Tier 1 definition is. It's simply 'any International Match in which both of the teams participating are the “A” Representative Teams of the Members concerned, or an International Match involving a Scratch Team.'. That the matches are tier 1, can be confirmed on FIFA's website. If you check out Timor, and click on Women's, you quickly see that that the most recent match was the match against Malaysia, which I provided the summary above; FIFA doesn't list Tier 2 matches here (which is why the match in the same tournament against the Australia women's national under-20 soccer team on July 29th isn't shown). Nfitz (talk) 22:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed, and that's why I don't edit in this area, for that very reason. But you've made it clear enough to me as a layman that these international country vs country women's matches are tier 1. I may not know soccer football, but I know how to read policy and these women players do seem to meet WP:NFOOTBALL's 1st criterion. Keep. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - per national team appearances. Hmlarson (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - per national team appearances, recommend cancelling this AFD, researching the players properly, and listing any remaining players separately.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:48, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes NFOOTY, has played senior international football, in a fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Fenix down (talk) 09:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.