Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peek email device


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Peek email device

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Recently launched product. No notability at present and, I suspect, unlikely to become notable. Sgroupace (talk) 01:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep. I've seen this on Engadget, and I think it's notable enough, however it should have a stub template added. Psychcf (talk) 02:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, nontrivial coverage in the New York Times, among others. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC).
 * Weak keep and expand significantly, the article is unsourced as of now. However I see nontrivial coverage when doing a simple google search. --Banime (talk) 20:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:28, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.   -- John Vandenberg (chat) 03:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I just saw this product in Target last night, and I read about it from David Pogue from the New York Times demonstrating and reviewing it; coverage from a known tech reporter is definitiely notable.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per Nate's comments. Notability seems to be established B figura  (talk) 19:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.