Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peekko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 23:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Peekko

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. This subject appears to lack non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 00:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage is . Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. I can't find proper sources to back an article. If the extension gains in popularity (and coverage), an article might be appropriate at a later date. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete fails the WP:WEB test andyzweb (talk) 06:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.