Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peeled Snacks (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

This closure might be contested but the previous AFD was interrupted by a Speedy Deletion and had no participation so I don't think it can count as a previous AFD as it was technically opened and then closed. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Peeled Snacks
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Defunct company with very little notability. GraziePrego (talk) 03:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NCORP, references are below standard, appears only to be notable for going out of business, a common enough business happening to be treated as WP:ROTM 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies,  and New York. Shellwood (talk) 09:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.