Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peephole TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, per WP:N. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Peephole TV

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possibly non-notable TV station, article created by the gentleman who founded the station. GNEWS shows no hits, a normal Google search shows only TV listings (to be expected) and anti-Scientology sites (Oliver Schaper is apparently a Scientologist). Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 21:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - no claim to notability. This is a subscription only iptv channel with no notable presence --T-rex 23:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

*REMAIN - Channel is available in local cable systems in the U.S. and Mexico.(Cable version, Mexico D.F.). Seem to have just older press releases. Keep for maintenance and updates.174.145.128.163 (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC) — 174.145.128.163 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. — 174.145.128.163 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * I have to agree with the previous poster, channels are available in my local cable system. QuestCable Phoenix, AZ.--70.1.174.14 (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC) — 70.1.174.14 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Striken as sockpuppets Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 00:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * STAY Admin is abusing his powers and made changes to an article without any proper background information. How can an Admin that is UK based make any suggestions for a Television network in the U.S. In addition, Turkey is in Europe and the channels are avaiable via Kutus. Please keep your anti-Scientology thoughts out of your work as admin.Oschaper (talk) 06:50, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please WP:AGF. I am a Scientologist and I was about to list this for deletion review myself and saw that another already started the review. I have no strong opinion or knowledge of the topic area so will not !vote here. I had previously noted that the article did not assert notability and I tagged it and had some discussion with the article creator on my talk page. --Justallofthem (talk) 15:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * From my review, the statement by Oschaper was directed at Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry.--Whereismycardude (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, and I am asking Oschaper to please WP:AGF that Calvary's comments and/or edits had nothing to do with any hypothetical bias against Scientology. Which hypothetical bias I have seen no indication of. --Justallofthem (talk) 19:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

REMAINCan not verify that the initial editor and listed key people are the same person.--Whereismycardude (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC) — Whereismycardude (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. - Stricken as a sock Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 23:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete article's subject fails a number of criteria for inclusion including but, not limited to WP:N, WP:CORP, and WP:V — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasynnash2 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete As above comment stated, this article is created by the owner, information doesn't meet WP:V or WP:RS for citations (There are none).Groupsisxty (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The article was created by 'OSchaper', who placed 'Dr Oliver Schaper' in the 'key people' field. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 18:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree w/ nom - Article's subject matter lacks significant coverage in independent WP:RS/WP:V sources. Was not really able to find any discussion in secondary sources whatsoever. Cirt (talk) 06:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This page is just an advert.  I would suggest merging it into Oliver Schaper, but his antics don't seem to have got him enough press coverage to merit an article yet.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 18:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.