Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peeps (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Peeps (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Probable hoax. I didn't trying speedy-ing it because there is some context there, but searching for austin rogers peeps without quotes resulted in a mere six Ghits: two Wikipedia, and the other four about unrelated people named Austin Rogers (and "people", rather than "peeps"; and used in a different context). Is it winter already?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 06:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing here to show that this film is actively being planned, let alone notable. I'd suggest that it redirect to the actor's page, but other than one role in How to Eat Fried Worms I don't see that Rogers is really all that notable, although the page might just need some work. Plus there's the whole "this might be a complete hoax" thing to consider.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:36, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Erpert.  No sources whatsoever provided or found.--Arxiloxos (talk) 17:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ONEDAY: "If you have invented something novel in school, in your university lab, your garage, or the pub, and it has not yet been featured in reliable sources, please do not write about it in Wikipedia." Principle applies here with amateur films. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete. If Austin Rogers actually began this project with friends, that fact lacks any sort of verifiability... assuring no place for this article anywhere on Wikipedia. And even when unsourcable, the article itself offers us the nail for its coffin: "due to scheduling conflicts the remainder of Peeps has been postponed indefinitely."  Not only does the topic fail WP:NFF, WP:GNG... but more importantly, it fails WP:V.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.