Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peer-taught classes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  22:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Peer-taught classes

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:SUBSTUB unreferenced for 15 years since creation and not expanded since. WP:PROD has been declined. I can't find any evidence this term is used beside the colloquial meaning. There are few hits for it in GBooks/GScholar, but there is no evidence this is a defined term connected to an established theory or practice. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  08:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge The topic is quite notable and we have several other pages about it including learning by teaching, peer-led team learning, peer mentoring, peer tutor, &c. There is also an extensive glossary of education terms and so we are spoilt for choice in selecting a sensible alternative to deletion. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The source you found is about Peer tutoring, a term not mentioned in the current article. Perhaps a new article can be written from scratch about that topic, but here we are discussing the term 'peer-taught classes'. PS. Actually, we have an article at Peer tutor which discusses thic concept, although it probably should be moved to 'peer tutoring'. The current term can be redirected there. Would this be an acceptable outcome? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is not SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. No way does this merit its own article and there is nothing in this one sentence article which is worth keeping.  // Timothy ::  talk  00:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. It maybe sort of is a thing in real life, but that doesn't mean it's a notable enough subject for an encyclopedia--for that we have to start with reliable sources. Thank you User:Piotrus. Drmies (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR and WP:TOOSOON. This certainly exists, but it's not so common, nor established, nor notable that it could be an encyclopedia article sourced with secondary sources. It's defined as something other than peer tutoring, so a redirect might confuse our readers. Bearian (talk) 12:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.