Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeerCast (app)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

PeerCast (app)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No legit claim to notability. Fails WP:CORP. I can only find two credible sources on it and they mention it in passing. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete no indication of notability. I found this passing mention but it's not that much.  Ana  r  chyte   12:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 11:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 11:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Software company article of unclear notability. The only independent significant coverage in the current refs is the longer http://digital.di.se/ piece. One piece of significant coverage is typically insufficient to establish notability. The other refs are PR, incidental mentions, or published by the university where the project was developed. A search turned up no additional significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 11:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.