Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pegah Anvarian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Three relistings already. WP:NPASR Courcelles 00:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Pegah Anvarian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article contains no claims or references supporting notability. Google search gives some retail links, but no editorial coverage. Fails WP:ANYBIO Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 17:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've found some sources and linked to them, but there's not a whole lot out there that is anything other than a trivial mention. She certainly seems to be incredibly close to passing Wikipedia's notability guidelines, but there isn't enough yet to where I'd say she is overwhelmingly so.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: OK, I am coming straight from the Daniel Hernandez AfD, but after arguing a (very weak) keep for him, I have to vote keep for Ms. Anvarian based on the online sources. I am seeing hits for her in magazines going back to 2004 on Google Books, so she has been around for eight years at least (and is still around). The article is appropriately neutral in tone and the sources are sufficient to pass minimal notability. As she is still working, further reliable sources will come along to support the material that is already out there. Mabalu (talk) 10:55, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 06:04, 26 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.