Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pegasus Intellectual Capital Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:45, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Pegasus Intellectual Capital Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not meet our strict general notability guideline. (Dear non-Wikipedians: Please see WP:42 for a summary of the guideline.)

Zero Google News Archive hits. I also looked through the first couple of pages of Google search results, but I couldn't find any reliable sources.

&mdash;Unforgettableid (talk) 18:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The Columbia ref is a mere directory listing.
 * The company's cited entry on the BusinessWeek Company Insight Center website is also just a glorified directory listing.
 * Delete - support nom. wholeheartedly. Dreck; fails WP:CORPDEPTH; should have been PRODed if not for anon IP socks. — Brianhe (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Only two references; no evidence of WP:NOTABILITY at all. APerson241 (talk!) 19:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: There is no reliable coverage. SL93 (talk) 05:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Not currently notable.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.