Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peggy Clydesdale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Peggy Clydesdale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination per WP:AGF on behalf of, whose rationale (from this edit) was "Not a notable person. Made by the said individual (bedpan username). Half the citations don't work or are to their own pages." I have no real comment on the merits, except to note that the references do indeed appear to be lacking somewhat. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete without prejudice. It may be simply that the references are lacking, but in its current state this appears to fail WP:ARTIST as well as the more general benchmarks of WP:PEOPLE and general notability. Rivertorch   FIRE WATER   16:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:49, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG simplest standards, no RS coverage on subject.  Cllgbksr (talk) 06:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete My searches are finding nothing; sources in article are local.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.