Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peirce's criterion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete: copyvio --Durin 21:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Peirce's criterion
This article is a copy and paste from a linked-to .pdf of original research. Zsinj 17:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is not original research, despite the format. Much needs to be done to improve the article (I could say everything needs to be done), but the topic is worthy and maybe the linked review article will help a statistically minded editor. Physchim62 (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyvio. Stifle 17:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a copyvio. If verifiable information can be provided with references, and not just a copy and paste, perhaps a future recreation of this page would be acceptable. -Rebelguys2 18:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Stifle, copyvio. PJM 18:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - copyvio. Latinus 20:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.