Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pejawar Swamiji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Pejavara Matha Guru Parampara. Cirt (talk) 16:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Pejawar Swamiji

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The person mentioned in the article is same as Vishwesha Theertharu.therefore delete this page Sarangsaras (talk) 13:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep; merge content into Vishwesha Theertharu and turn this into a redirect. —C.Fred (talk) 14:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per C.Fred. When two articles about the same person have non-identical content, and the person's notability is not an issue, that's the only option available. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  -- - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 16:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 16:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect -- Redtigerxyz Talk 17:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note Merge tag was already in place, the nominator of this has been blocked for being a disruptive puppet master, it's best to close this nomination and let the merge take place. - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 16:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pejavara Matha Guru Parampara which is a list of the swamis of Pejavar Math. Also keep Vishwesha Theertharu which is n article about the current pontiff of the Matha. --Deepak D'Souza 05:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per above. Wikid as&#169; 02:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pejavara Matha Guru Parampara per Deepak D'Souza as this is a title not restricted to the current holder(?). - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 15:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.