Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelé Rap's Revolutionary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No prejudice against a renomination; not enough commenting here to make a proper decision — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Pelé Rap's Revolutionary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BASIC. The references in the article either don't pass WP:RS or are about the subject's father. I don't think the YFM Hot 9 countdown or the Hype magazine profile are enough to pass WP:MUSICBIO on their own. The TV appearance doesn't automatically confer notability either. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 10:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  20:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

 WP:MUSICBIO guidelines have been met, but are always more difficult when sourcing notable indie artists. References to the subject and the subject's father meet WP:RS as well. TV appearances certainly do not automatically confer notability, however, in terms of music entertainment "notability" means something completely different to people 12-34 than it does to older demographics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nostrand12 (talk • contribs) 09:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Nostrand, and thanks for commenting. Could you clarify which references to the subject exactly you think pass WP:RS? I think that is the point that is going to have the most relevance for the discussion here. Also, if you think that any criteria of WP:MUSICBIO have been met other than number one, it would be helpful if you could say which ones these were. And feel free to ask me if you have any questions about any of this. Best — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 11:20, 14 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.