Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelé Rap's Revolutionary (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 04:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Pelé Rap's Revolutionary
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am renominating this after a recent AfD discussion that I initiated, Articles for deletion/Pelé Rap's Revolutionary, ended with no consensus due to low participation. I'm hoping that I can get a decision one way or the other after I first patrolled the article back in July 2012. Here is my deletion rationale from the previous discussion:
 * Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BASIC. The references in the article either don't pass WP:RS or are about the subject's father. I don't think the YFM Hot 9 countdown or the Hype magazine profile are enough to pass WP:MUSICBIO on their own. The TV appearance doesn't automatically confer notability either.

My opinion hasn't changed since the previous nomination. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 12:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 12:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 12:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 12:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - In sufficient coverage to establish notability. I note that many of the soruces are not reliable.  The Philadelphia Inquirer article ia bout his father, and the CNN article is from their iReprot initiative which is community submitted articles which are explicitly noted as not fact checked. -- Whpq (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I didn't find anything about him that would justify a blp about him. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.