Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelican State Beach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 07:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Pelican State Beach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Pelican State Beach seems to exist but that's all we can really say about it. Also, this page is the locus of disruption of an artist who has been disrupting Wikipedia for 3 years. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 14:14, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. As a legitimate California state park and a significant named place, I don't see why this should be deleted. It is notable as the northern terminus of the California Coastal Trail and the northernmost beach in the state; in addition to the authoritative official website already cited, it is covered as such in multiple sources such as  etc. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not only a legitimate California State Beach, but it has received significant coverage from reliable secondary sources easily demonstrating passing WP:GNG. If we were to delete articles because vandals have disrupted them, we'd have to delete just about every major article in WP.--Oakshade (talk) 23:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Easy keep Notable as a state park, and plenty of coverage available. --MelanieN (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.