Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pella's 6th Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 17:07, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Pella's 6th Law

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable, just 70 hits on Google. Uwe Pella scores just 457 hits in all languages. Looks like a neologism used for a bit of promotion. Night of the Big Wind talk  18:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Irretrievably nonsensical.  Cusop Dingle (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete The article says it is a "comparatively common metaphor" but there isn't a single Google Books hit. The article is wrong and the topic is not notable.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  20:31, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I suspect this might be a hoax. But let's be charitable and say that it's simply not notable and that there are no references to it in any reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete based on, at minimum, failure to verifiable demonstrate notability. --DGaw (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cusop Dingle. This metaphor bases on the 10 Fundamental Laws of Complexity Management by Uwe Pella and refers to §6, which is:     §6 Every process, and so its states, can be divided in infinitely many fractals  6.1 The more exact the detail the more extensive the whole.   6.2 The small determines the large and the large determines the frame – NEVER vice versa!..... Pella’s 6th fundamental law bases on that fact and on the work of Georg Cantor and Helge von Koch, who created the idea of fractals. A range requires a movement from Point A to point B. A movement is per definitionem always a change and therefore a process. So the correlation between mathematics and complexity management and processes is stated.  The "litrature" cited for this proposition includes Hegel's The Phenomenology of Spirit.  But this has to do with "Lean Management Processes", a phrase that even Hegel could have seen through. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 22:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - surely this is a hoax, no? But it's certainly not notable or verifiable. I see it lacks categories: ok, how about 'hoax articles', 'undeleted hoaxes', 'intellectual jokes', 'wizard wiki pranks'. Hegelian dialectic: they propose it, we delete it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 23:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 05:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like spam to me; delete. Bearian (talk) 01:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable law in a non-notable series of laws by non-notable author Uwe Pella. Google searching turns up just enough evidence to suggest that there is such a person, but no more. --MelanieN (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.