Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peloton 3.1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:44, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Peloton 3.1

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is written in Spanish (and is still being edited in the same language) and has not been translated after more than two weeks, as would've been needed for WP:PNT. An IP removed a prod tag, so here is the Afd process. De728631 (talk) 21:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, quickly per WP:SNOW. Not only does the author continue to add more and more Spanish content to the article, he has ignored all reminders I have put on his talk page (which I have used Google Translate to put my reminders in Spanish) about the need to have this article translated. This article has now been in existence for almost three weeks in Spanish on an English encyclopedia - it is time for it to go. Singularity42 (talk) 21:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this is the English language Wiki. Alatari (talk) 22:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above. An article about a season of a show that doesn't have an article. Joe Chill (talk) 01:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Article is now translated. Still need to determine notability, etc. In any event, the article needs to be re-named. Singularity42 (talk) 01:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would put a comment here, but Joe Chill says what I was gonna say (almost verbatim, actually). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  10:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment There is a similar stub Pelotón III, dealing with another season of that series. Even if this article Peloton 3.1 has now been translated, I see no reason why single seasons of a show should be covered when there is no main article at all. De728631 (talk) 23:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Current translation is clearly automated, no legitimate translation would use the phrase "unknown internet postulated". As stated above, the show needs its own article before creating season articles. It's difficult to establish notability as even the Spanish wiki version is unreferenced. Sarilox (talk) 03:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with the above, the show itself needs to have an article and establish its notability. Articles for individual seasons exist as forks of the main article - a long-running show would quickly have an unreadable article otherwise - so we need to start there. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 18:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I left a keep note at Articles for deletion/Pelotón III. Massive coverage in RS. Show is clearly notable.  Why not userfy the content per WP:PRESERVE invoking AGF, instead of erasing the stuff.  Why are alternatives to deletion not considered? Power.corrupts (talk) 21:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The closing admin (or any admin) could userfy the content at the author's request, and I would have no objection to that (might even be the one to do it, if asked). I think it would be better to start a new article for the show, from scratch, and then bring in content on the seasons, but whatever works is fine. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 16:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfying in this case is not very likely to be effective. This article was nominated for deletion in the first place because the author is seemingly unable or unwilling to contribute his article in English and has not reacted whatsoever to any of the comments and requests on his user talk page. So even if the show is notable per se I think we should not leave it to this particular author to prepare the English Wikipedia article. De728631 (talk) 21:38, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * What is the problem? The article was not worked on for two weeks. It was in Spanish (no longer). There is no WP:DEADLINE. Clearly notable. The similar Articles for deletion/Pelotón III seems to pass, so keep or merge the stuff there. Power.corrupts (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.