Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pen lid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Pen lid

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article provides no meaningful content to Wikipedia that couldn't be and isn't already covered in pen. The article creator has been known to do this on several different topics. Illinois2011 (talk) 08:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and WP:NOT. Monty  845  08:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, as many pen caps have holes in them and are intentionally not air tight, its not even accurate. Monty 845  08:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom or Redirect to Pen LordVetinari (talk) 10:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and Redirect--Shrike (talk) 14:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced, not notable, and not a plausible search term Cullen328 (talk) 15:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - snowball this. No redirect called for; not even the common term for a pen cap, and people who are interested in pens will know where to go. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this article, don't leave a redirect, and remove the computer priveleges of the original creator. There's having a laugh and there's taking the Michael. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and crush article creator with virtual tractor.--Milowent • talkblp-r 19:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * DElete: non notable subject. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.