Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pender Early College High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. There isn't an actual request for deletion yet in this discussion. If someone actually wants this article deleted, they can renominate it at their convenience if they supply a reason to do so. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:12, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Pender Early College High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article is not a means of promotion. It is a notable article. Searching for it on google, one will see the notability. It has been noted on PR Newswire, StarNews, The Pender Post, and it is a school after all. If PECHS does not deserve a Wikipedia page, then does Isaac Bear Early College? Does the Early College at Guilford? I believe yes. --Dcamposeco (talk) 04:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep why should this page be deleted? It might need editing, but not deleting.--Dcamposeco (talk) 04:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. I know it's not gospel, but I agree with this:
 * ...Put another way, if someone wants to write an article about their high school, we should relax and accommodate them, even if we wish they wouldn't do it. And that's true *even if* we should react differently if someone comes in and starts mass-adding articles on every high school in the world. Let me make this more concrete.  Let's say I start writing an article about my high school, Randolph School, of Huntsville, Alabama.  I could write a decent 2 page article about it, citing information that can easily be verified by anyone who visits their website. Then I think people should relax and accommodate me.  It isn't hurting anything.  It'd be a good article, I'm a good contributor, and so cutting me some slack is a very reasonable thing to do... (Jimbo Wales, Partial solution to rampant deletionism, Wikimedia, 2003-11-07.
 * This is not a bad article, and any defects it has can be repaired. It meets the Jimbo Decent Two-Page Article criterion.™   TJRC (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment&mdash;The enrollment is on the low side for a stand-along high school article. But it can always be merged into, say, Pender County Schools. There's no reason to delete it.&mdash;RJH (talk) 22:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I note that the nomination was the sole contribution by an IP - curious! No grounds for deletion have been specified. In any case, sources are available from which the page can be expanded to meet WP:ORG. The arguments for keeping high schools are at WP:HS/N. TerriersFan (talk) 01:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.