Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pendlwood studios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE &mdash;Wh o uk (talk) 10:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Pendlwood studios
The parent company Fidelity Entertainment Group was speedied as not notable. This one is even less notable. Ezeu 19:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. joturn e r 20:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

The parent company as well as this studio are both being deemed not important enough, however in the market they exist they are revolutionary. Basing its importance solely on Google hits is irrelevant. It is an independent grassroots based Music Company. It reflects the changing market of music in the new millennium. Fidelity Entertainment Group and Pendlwood Studios both allow artists to do all the things it took a major label to accomplish along with digital distribution through such companies as itunes. The fact that this company has grown out of the Christian rock music industry, which is small by comparison to the mainstream market, should not change the fact that what this company is doing with Fidelity Entertainment Group is revolutionary. It is the beginning of what has already shown to be changing the entire music market place.

Also penalizing for having a myspace page is a very backwards way for an online encyclopedia to look at things. Myspace is the future of culture in this millennium and I believe we will only see more of life moving to an online existence.

The fact that you have a company that allows artist to record produce promote design distribute and sell their product entirely on the Internet without special selection by a major label IS the future.

If you still feel that deleting both pages is necessary, I have no option. I however would encourage you to reconsider. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Muse93muse (talk • contribs).


 * Strong Delete besides the parent company, this thing is also started and run by the twice-deleted for NN CR Pendleton {deletion log) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 22:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes it's me CR Pendleton Muse93muse, I am not trying to hide anything. Delete at will [muse93muse]


 * Delete: non-notable company, and the articles creator even admits that it merits deletion. --Hetar 17:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Stifle (talk) 15:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.