Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peninsula Gaming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 18:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Peninsula Gaming

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

small gaming company. almost all the references seem about their attempts to acquire property  DGG ( talk ) 08:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Multiple reliable sources in the references.  Not sure that the topic of covered in those sources can make some thing not notable. Clearly WP:GNG is meet. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've expanded the article with more references that should make it clear that WP:GNG is satisfied. Though I'm not sure why this AfD was opened without even an argument for deletion from the nom. Neither the fact that the company is small, nor the fact that most of the refs were "about their attempts to acquire property" are reasons for deletion. Toohool (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.