Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penman and Sommerlad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Penman and Sommerlad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Stub article about a newspaper column. No notable independent coverage in secondary sources. Popcornfud (talk) 16:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Popcornfud (talk) 16:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - Literally a poor stub article, but most importantly fails GNG! Ekdalian (talk) 14:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.