Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penn Medicine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.  DGG ( talk ) 03:37, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Penn Medicine

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Governing board of University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. No sources to show notability. Not notable. GrapedApe (talk) 19:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Keep Keep Just click on the news link above for evidence of notability. --Kvng (talk) 20:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Those appear to be all just mere mentions of the board, or mentions of the Pen medical school, not substantial sources about the board, as required by WP:N.--GrapedApe (talk) 21:02, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That doesn't appear to be the case to me. I'm a long way from Penn though. But if you are right, then why not just do a merge into University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine? --Kvng (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd be OK with that as a result.--GrapedApe (talk) 23:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge - It makes sense for information about the governing board of the school of medicine to be in the article aboutt he school of medicine. -- Whpq (talk) 13:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  08:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Merge. I completely agree with Whpq's analysis.  (The next thing you know, we'll have separate articles for Coca-Cola, Inc and its board.)  WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.