Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penn State Nittany Lions volleyball all time record


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Content available by email. lifebaka++ 13:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Penn State Nittany Lions volleyball all time record

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Merely a statistical table of results, which is not appropriate per WP:NOT. Zim Zala Bim talk  18:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  23:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 14:01, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - What about all the football articles that have statistics, like This or this? Plus it isn't online anywhere, so it's good information. Smuckers It has to be good 21:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * First, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Second, this is a fine example of a season-by-season summary. And this intends to provide a statistical summary of a single year, focusing on notable occurrences (upsets, for example), and the conference standings. Penn State Nittany Lions volleyball all time record, unfortunately, is merely a list of all their win-losses, without any discrimination regarding notability, context, etc. This is likely found in an external source which can easily be linked to. -- Zim Zala Bim talk  21:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I wrote it myself..no external links. It's all from a book I have, so I wrote it because I doubt many people have the book. Smuckers It has to be good 22:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - this isn't an encyclopedia article, in other words, per WP:NOT.--PhilKnight (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.