Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennington-Grimes Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete the article. Mailer Diablo 02:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Pennington Grimes
NN elementary school. Assertion of nobility present (best academic performance}, but anybody can say that. No external links, statistics. Kareeser|Talk! 06:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TheRingess 06:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Agreed that the "renouned" statement needs verification if it is to be a valid (and NPOV) claim to notability (and hopefully the school's educational norms include how to spell the word renowned). –Sommers (Talk) 09:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep as per wiki/schools Jcuk 10:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup per vague consensus achieved months ago at Schools.   Proto    ||    type    11:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wiki/schools is not policy. School is not notable with being granted inherent notability. Bobby1011 14:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Schools are more notable than subway stations, and subway stations are per se notable. Monicasdude 14:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Elementary school with no claim to notability.--Isotope23 15:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Notability (music) is not "Policy", however you try telling that to anyone voting delete on a musical article. Schools guideline states the only criterion for notability of schools is verifiability. Jcuk 22:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article does nothing to provide readers with any pertinent information. A waste of bandwidth. D e nni &#9775;  03:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Schools/Arguments, verifiable schools are perfectly notable. Silensor 23:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment as per Schools/Arguments, this particular school isn't particularly notable. It claims (rather, claimed) to have an excellent academic record, but that hasn't been verified, nor will it, if the article stays. Kareeser|Talk! 01:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep schools. Stifle 00:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment &mdash; An editor has rewritten the article. It now contains a listing of the ethnic makeup of the school, broken down into percentages. I find that a little segregatory (if that is a word), and besides that, it also contains no notable information either. Kareeser|Talk! 01:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. Bahn Mi 01:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Schools/Arguments  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 02:11, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. KWH 04:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.