Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennsylvania Railroad 4483


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pennsylvania Railroad class I1s. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Pennsylvania Railroad 4483

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I cannot find any significant coverage for this locomotive in reliable sources, beyond "it exists". Fails to meet notability guidelines. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge A subsection on the Decapod article should be sufficient, doesn't seem to be any more notable than others of the class, beyond being the last one. Oaktree b (talk) 23:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge: As per above. Railpictures.net returns 4 photos of PRR 4483, little else. --Whiteguru (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Pennsylvania Railroad class I1s and put some of the information of it in there, since there are very little sources on this particular locomotive. Gorden 2211 (talk) 03:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge (to Pennsylvania Railroad class I1s) if someone else wishes to do a meaningful merge. Merging to the Decapod disambig page seems insane, if  was intended that should of been said said explicitly and a merge there WP:UNDUE therefore I object to those targets. Djm-leighpark (talk) 02:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Pennsylvania Railroad class I1s, as per above. I found a few book references to support individual statements in the article, but no substantial coverage. As the sole surviving member of its class, 4483 would make a nice subsection in that article. Ackatsis (talk) 10:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.