Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny Collenette (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  J 947(c) (m) 18:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Penny Collenette
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, unelected politician - WP:NPOL, WP:POLOUTCOMES, and MOS:CA. Madg2011 (talk) 19:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. While she certainly would not meet the WP:NPOL guideline, her selection to the Order of Ontario is pretty persuasive evidence of her notability.   PK  T (alk)  19:27, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article definitely needs a major overhaul, I won't argue with that — as written, it puts far too much weight on her non-winning candidacy for Parliament, and not enough on her actual basis for notability, which is her time as a Liberal campaign strategist and staffer in the PMO in the Jean Chrétien era. A ProQuest search reveals quite a bit of coverage of her in those roles, as well, so the sourcing can be repaired to put the notability where it belongs. And yeah, the Order of Ontario don't hurt. Bearcat (talk) 07:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I trust Bearcat that based on ProQuest she would meet the GNG as a political strategist. Regardless of that, she meets WP:ANYBIO by having the Order of Ontario. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.