Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny Plunderer (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of Batman family enemies. There were a couple of suggested redirect targets but this one seemed to come up more frequently. If you have a different opinion, you can bring it to WP:RFD or start a discussion on the redirect talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Penny Plunderer
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Very minor antagonist in the franchise who has barely shown up past his initial appearance. The previous deletion discussion allowed it to stay due to a few encyclopedic sources, but outside of those few sources, I don't believe it meets GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 (talk) 00:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. Pokelego999 (talk) 00:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fancruft. Made one appearance and was seemingly (the article isn’t very clear) retconned out of existence. Run-of-the-WP:MILL dumb early villain who went nowhere. Highly unlikely to have in depth sources. Dronebogus (talk) 01:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect seems appropriate here. List of Batman family enemies is close to what was suggested in the previous AfD. &mdash;siro&chi;o 01:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Nobody is going to search for or even link to the Penny Plunderer, a strong contender for most obscure Batman villain ever. Dronebogus (talk) 01:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand. That's fine. It's not generally an argument to delete. See WP:WEDONTNEEDIT &mdash;siro&chi;o 20:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Then call me "nobody", because I actually have. Nearly every article I have seen concerning the Batcave notes this character due to the large penny trophy. (Even Wikipedia: Batcave.) And wondering who the heck that is, is honestly human nature. This isn't like noting whether Batman ate a ham sandwich on Tuesday. - jc37 00:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Batman family enemies - I don't think there is any material worth merging, but he is already included in the target list and redirects are cheap. And honestly, I can see this being at least a plausible search, if only for people hearing the trivia of where Batman's giant penny originated from. Rorshacma (talk) 02:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per . 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  05:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above, the article doesn't go beyond plot summary and catalogue-like "appeared in" listings. There is nothing to indicate this character meets WP:GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge with List of DC Comics characters: P in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. We have to put his media appearance somewhere. --Rtkat3 (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Why? We are not an INDISCRIMINATE collection of information! Dronebogus (talk) 00:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * indiscriminate - To use a quote from The Princess Bride: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." - jc37 00:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unconvinced that even the section on this villain in the Batman enemies list would survive a cleanup. Fails WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:33, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge/Redirect per above. - Whether the info is in a separate article, or on a list page is immaterial, as long as info about the character is retained. Both List of Batman family enemies and List of DC Comics characters: P would be appropriate targets for the info, if the article page is not kept. - jc37 00:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.