Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny Widmore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Penny Widmore
According to accepted practice within Lost editors, characters should only get their own articles if they have flashback episodes or if the actor/actress that portrays them is listed in the opening credits. While Penny Widmore might have a flashback episode in the fall, one cannot/should not determine this now, or speculate. Wikipedical 00:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --  Wikipedical 00:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --  PKtm 01:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --  Graveenib 01:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep   --  Jwebby91 19:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC) - sorry, I wasn't logged in before (I didn't notice). Or we'll end up making it again, anyway, so whatever.
 * Comment -- See Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. -- PKtm 19:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment -- oh thank you so much!! there's a reason i said "Or we'll end up making it again, anyway, so whatever." besides, if we can include the five new season three cast members, why not make pages that will be made in the future? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.167.82 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 14 August 2006
 * Comment -- You're welcome. The "why not" is in fact what's covered by Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, specifically, "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation." -- PKtm 00:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete --  Demon Hog 04:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Did they actually think that they could get away with this?  (P.S. Are unregistered users allowed to vote?)
 * Delete--Peephole 14:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Minor characters should not get their own page. If Penny becomes a major character later then recreating this page might be in order.  --Jabrwocky7 18:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --notability not established.65.35.168.248 02:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * OOPS the system must have logged me out. :) Dlohcierekim 03:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.