Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penrhiw Priory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Lopifalko (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Penrhiw Priory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable business. Having cleared out its primary sources, the two left are very generic. I have looked for more sources but could not find anything with more than a one line glancing mention (here), not enough to count. Doesn't satisfy WP:COMPANY, / WP:ORGCRIT. The same user has created (Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi) or edited (Roch Castle) articles on this business's other 2 premises. Lopifalko (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * It makes things a little easier once one realizes that the history books mainly call this a vicarage, with a few calling it a rectory, not a priory. You are looking for the wrong name.  You'll know when you've hit the right seam of sources when you turn up things such as what happened in World War 2.  Uncle G (talk) 14:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Listed building so see WP:GEOFEAT. Seems to be pretty large and significant. Street view. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep -- We cannot have an article for every listed building; there are just too many, but this is not a run-of-the mill case. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:23, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.