Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penrith Museum of Printing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 06:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Penrith Museum of Printing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources, no independent and reliable sources could be found from what I could see, and the article was likely created by a WP:UPE associated with the museum. Nathan2055talk - contribs 01:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: Local and specialist museums are a valuable part of the cultural environment, often sustained by the enthusiasm of volunteers, and I regard articles on them as part of the almanac/gazetteer functions here, but it can be awkward to find a suitable level of specific coverage which can independently reference the text and demonstrate notability. In this case, some coverage exists in External Links, though not sufficient for WP:ORGDEPTH; there is also a paywalled 2018 Daily Telegraph article on "Penrith Museum of Printing's Great Expansion", if someone can access and assess its depth? AllyD (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep There's a reasonable account of the place here. It seems to be low in conventional notability but note that WP:N is a guideline not a policy and so explicitly says that it is "best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply".  Policies applicable include WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Andrew Davidson. A case where WP:NOTPAPER is applicable. Deus et lex (talk) 23:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.