Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentagram (game engine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 05:26Z 

Pentagram (game engine)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

PROD was contested after the fact. Prod rationale was "vaporware, unreleased fangame, no assertion of notability, no 3rd-party citations, possible advertisement". Unless the article is updated extensively to reflect something that has changed in the real world about this, I believe it should be deleted. GRBerry 16:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per prod. Only link is to their own site; no evidence of 3rd-party sources. Walton monarchist89 17:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Who contested it and why? Anyway, Delete per prod rationale. Calabrese 18:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm wondering who contested this - I asked the prodder to be more careful in notifying the primary contributor to the article (me) if the article has been around for a while, but I'm not contesting the prod. The software is, technically, unreleased. So I'm saying delete until the thing is actually 1.0'd, it's included in some real software distro, and there's even some press out that discusses this. It's not really as famous as Exult. Yet. Let's resurrect it once it is. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.