Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentavalent impurity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect; an obvious target, most probably unknown to the non-expert author of the initial text. Twri (talk) 05:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Pentavalent impurity

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Wikipedia is not a dictionary jheiv (talk) 09:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Transwiki to wiktionary, for obvious reasons.   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 14:15, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve There seems to be plenty at Google Books to establish that this is a notable subject. A merge if it's discussed somewhere else would be fine too, but I don't see why we wouldn't want an article here in addition to a definition at Wiktionary. Trivalent impurity redirect to Acceptor (semiconductors), but neither impurity type seems to be actually discussed in that article. Maybe N-type semiconductor? If they have significance in other applications, that's all the more reason an indepentent article would be useful and appropriate. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect. This article (and "Trivalent impurity") were obviously created by a person who doesn't know the subject well. I was bold and redirected this page where it belongs. Twri (talk) 05:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.