Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentecostal Young People's Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Indian Pentecostal Church of God. Spartaz Humbug! 11:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Pentecostal Young People's Association
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable organization, for which I cannot find any significant coverage in Google News, only some passing mentions. Drmies (talk) 03:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced organization, no indication of notability. Simonm223 (talk) 14:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - I have found some mentions on a Google search, which may be evidence of some notability. Bearian (talk) 15:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are some mentions there--but the ones I looked at which weren't simply from websites (such as this) were only passing mentions, not significant discussion or coverage. Drmies (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge to Indian Pentecostal Church of God, unless it is expanded enough to warrant an article of its own during the AFD period. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge. The hits on Google that I'm seeing (apart from the first several which are all primary sources and thus not sufficient under WP:GROUP) hint that it's possible to meet notability, but I don't think it's widespread and significant enough to merit its own article.  Cocytus   [»talk«]  02:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.