Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentti Uusihauta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Pentti Uusihauta

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable olympian Avilich (talk) 21:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:50, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Olympics. Avilich (talk) 21:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:17, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Regularly competed in Finland in the 40s and 50s, if we can dig up the sources used in the Finnish Wikipedia article, we might be able to see if his national achievements meet GNG. Kingsif (talk) 03:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - The fi.wp sources are not great. Based on the name, the Siukkonen book (Urheilukunniamme puolustajat – Suomen olympiaedustajat 1906–2000) sounds like it contains a short description of literally every olympic athlete in Finnish history. It might be fine, but I'd expect it to be a rather short entry. The Tilastopaja website (again, based on the name: or something like that) is presumably just stats. A search of the Finnish National Archive's newspaper archive doesn't surface much of interest. This article by Hufvudstadsbladet and this article from Helsingin Sanomat (both still under copyright, so access only with a researcher account) are a good examples: a few hits for the name, but the content is just your bog-standard sports event coverage without going to the subject in any real detail. There might be additional sourcing, but we generally disregard hypothetical sourcing in these discussions. Please ping me if further sources are identified, and I'll happily reconsider. -Ljleppan (talk) 09:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.