Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penu Chalykoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 14:39, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Penu Chalykoff

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I cannot find nearly enough coverage for this individual.  — fetch ·  comms   17:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO  Gtstricky Talk or C 13:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I also added a newspaper article about Penu Chalykoff's integral part in the show as an actor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.158.101 (talk) 00:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * — 76.64.158.101 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

COMMENT Penu Chalykoff is notable because Spellfury the webseries is notable, they have been reviewed and featured by Wired.com, Tubefilter and Ain't It Cool News

Added a better link to a recent full page newspaper article (EMC Perth) called "Perth-based online show casts spell on viewers" about Spellfury and Penu Chalykoff's role in the show.

He was also an actor in an award winning short called "Revelation" at the 2008 Houston Worldfest International Filmfest. He has a IMDB page. The show he is in is the top-rated show on visioweb.tv and the second most popular show on koldcast.tv

Keep Because Spellfury is a notable show and the newspaper article mentions him as a key team member "Another key team member is actor Penu Chalykoff, who appears in many episodes."Toronto23 (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * — Toronto23 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  14:56, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - not individually notable and almost no coverage in reliable citations, or merge to the notable show Spellfury, which has a CO template and has just been closed as keep. Off2riorob (talk) 09:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: Relisted due to the SPAs, so a couple of comments from non-SPAs would be needed even though it seems it is leaning towards delete. JForget  14:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see any need to relist, there are three deletes plus the nominators delete rational and two single purpose comments. Off2riorob (talk) 15:29, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.