Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penuballi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Penuballi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced since 2007. No WP:V to support what's said, no evidence to even support WP:N. Why do Indian villages (and this is a widespread problem) seemingly have a bye to the basic core policies of WP that are enforced on every other article? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep It's listed in the Indian census results for Khammam. It was classed as part of Andhra Pradesh not Telangana at the time of the last census. Any material which is controversial or of questionable accuracy can of course be deleted or tagged. Colapeninsula (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Looks like a real village/town to me. Frequently Indian places are difficult to verify due to the multiple different spellings in Latin characters.  This didn't seem to have the problem. --Oakshade (talk) 01:16, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:52, 22 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Verifiable tehsil/mandal with over 52,000 people. Satisfies WP:GEOLAND. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you're really claiming a population of 52,000 people, why not add that to the article? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Per deletion policy, AfD is not to be used as a substitution for regular editing. And it's not Gene93k "claiming" a population of 52,000", it's the Indian government reporting it. --Oakshade (talk) 21:15, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. I've added the population figures. Off-wiki commitments kept me from editing it sooner. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.