Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penzance Cricket Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. However, I will boldly redirect to Penzance afterwards. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Penzance Cricket Club

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced article about unremarkable sports club which fails general notability and WP:CRIN. Bob Re-born (talk) 08:00, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete : Unsourced amateur cricket club that fails all of the relevant notability guidelines. Mt  king  (edits)  10:39, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom and above comment. Guidelines state a club needs to play in an ECB Premier League, unfortunately Penzance doesn't. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 11:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unremarkable, unsourced amateur club that lacks multiple WP:RS to satisfy WP:CLUB or even WP:GNG … created by WP:BLOCKed WP:SPA with obvious WP:COI issues. Happy Editing! &mdash;  14:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Found one brief mention in a reliable source - not enough. Nwlaw63 (talk) 19:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral if verified this team could very well be notable for inclusion either standalone or in the article for the community from where it originates.LuciferWildCat (talk) 00:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Leave: This ″unremarkable amateur cricket club″ have been champions of Cornwall more times than any other club and has played in the ECB Cornwall Premier League in the past. Also employed a professional during the 1950's to 1970's and was the first club of Clifton 'Jack' Richards, an England wicket keeper. Why not encourage new contributors to wikipedia rather than alienate them by pouncing on their new article. Give them or someone else time to sort it out. Jowaninpensans (talk) 23:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.