Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's Alliance of New Brunswick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

People&
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:Notability DefensiveBlack (talk) 00:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, not particularly notable yet, but sources are there and a Gnews search shows even more coverage from multiple reliable sources. Hairhorn (talk) 00:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Registered political parties are notable. -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Important content. Political parties are inherently notable. Carrite (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * keep Im finding no actual reason for deletion actually being given by the nominator. beyond that it inhereintly fails notability. Which is a very large term which encompasses many issues. Why excatly does it fail notability? (willing to re-evaluate of course) but as default im seeing adequate secondary sourcing from secondary sourcing and notability being established as such, so looks ok. Ottawa4ever (talk) 19:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.