Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People Trends Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 21:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

People Trends Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Low-circulation magazine with no assertion of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NMAGAZINE. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested by anonymous editor. Filing Flunky (talk) 09:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Filing Flunky (talk) 09:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  —Filing Flunky (talk) 09:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I would like to point out that the nominator also attempted to use speedy delete criteria A7 to delete this. Magazines are not eligible for an A7 speedy deletion. Therefore this page was not speedy deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. Blogs and wikis do not reliable sources make.  As to prior tries at A7, I really don't care and it adds nothing to this conversation and looks more like a personal jab at the nominator.  Dennis Brown (talk) 16:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable at this point, not discussed in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Four-year-old, low circulation, self-described "lifestyle" magazine without substantial coverage from WP:RS sources = not notable. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable publication. Keb25 (talk) 22:56, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - As of now, it appears to be relatively undiscussed in reliable sources. Although there is no specific notability guideline for magazines, it does appear to fail Notability (books). Chris  (talk &#124; contribs) 20:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:NMAGAZINE, which had been brought up before. My fault for skimming. Chris  (talk &#124; contribs) 20:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.