Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People scratching themselves behind their ears


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW and CSDs G1 and G3 - this seems to be patent nonsense and borderline vandalism given its clear unsuitability. Nick Dowling (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

People scratching themselves behind their ears

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested by IP address. Prod nomination reasoning: "Unencyclopedic, lack of notability. Likely socially irrelevant". I find it difficult to disagree. Delete. Daniel (talk) 04:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Daniel on this article being seemingly unencyclopedic. Unless someone can provide a very good reason why this article meets our inclusion criteria I say it should be deleted.--Jersey Devil (talk) 04:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as the original user who prodded the article. I just can't find anything substantial to refute my initial thoughts.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 04:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Scratch as unencyclopedic content with no real coverage to speak of. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment well, it is referenced, and it may be seen that people often do this in conversation, and so it can't be socially irrelevant.- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 05:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's referenced, in a sense, but it's not encyclopædic. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.