Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People to People


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 19:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

People_to_People
This page has the same material as People to People Student Ambassador Program and the wording was taken from a prior edit so it is not as well written. In addition, it was created as a fork in order to bypass ongoing discussion on the primary page for this organization after several removals of sourced material. Markovich292 16:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete then Redirect to People to People Student Ambassador Program . Markovich292 16:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but with heavy reorganization, perhaps even renaming. People to People International is clearly an organization that covers many different things where the People to People Student Ambassador Program is just one aspect of that organization.  The current P2P-Student Ambassador article is jumbling several ideas and organizations together as if they were the same thing.  An unfortunate side effect here is that an attempt to make an NPOV article (or series of articles here, as may be the case) is also spilling into other trollish behavior due to several individuals espousing POV edits on these articles.   --Robert Horning 19:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but change to disambiguation page for People to People Student Ambassador Program and People to People International. Markovich292 01:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Since there is enough material to create seperate articles for "People to People International" and "People to People Student Ambassador Programs," this page may function better as a disambiguation page (as both organizations are referred to as simply "People to People"). That way, Mr. Horning's concerns about confusing the two groups will be clearly addressed. Markovich292 01:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I agree. Each page should describe the relationship of the organization it's describing to the other organization, and each page should link to the other. Mark Rosenthal 03:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.