Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peoples Grocery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Babajobu 04:59, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Peoples Grocery
I am just fixing the AFD nomination. Banana04131 03:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou for the fix. The article needs to be improved a lot, rewritten and change the biased point of view. As it is I nominated to be deleted. --Francisco Valverd e |Francisco Valverde 03:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Keep (edit conflict) but strong Cleanup. Article is very POV, but we should still have an article on the subject. --Banana04131 03:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Intensive clean up. There is no need to be biased in these subjects, just common sense. If the article is wikified, I agree to keep it. But let's not forget what is wikipedia. --Francisco Valverd e |Francisco Valverde 03:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep At least there is a claim of being a civil rights icon Ruby 03:46, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, successful claim to notability. Cleanup is a must though; if it comes back to AfD again without a rewrite, my vote changes to delete. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 05:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but clean the POV.--み使い Mitsukai 13:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment needs cleanup obviously if kept, but I'm not convinced of the notability. What makes this more notable than say the "Peoples Grocery" project that is trying to bring fresh produce to West Oakland, CA... where historically food has only been available in party stores?  There is only 1 source for this account.  I'm still undecided on this one.--Isotope23 17:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thought about it a bit. Keep, but WP:V the claim that this is a civil rights iconic event and cleanup the article.--Isotope23 18:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I've removed the "icon" part, doesn't seem like right wording. --Banana04131 01:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep and continue to improve. Yamaguchi先生 02:11, 13 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.