Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pepper the westie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mention may be made in another article independently.  Sandstein  09:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Pepper the westie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May not meet notability. Greek Legend (talk) 10:11, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    15:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    15:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    15:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete the only independent coverage I can find is this 8-sentence story from June 2015. The WP:GNG bar must be higher than this. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per failure of WP:GNG. As always, prominence on social media is not notability, and, judging from the lack of sources, this subject is not notable enough for an article. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Virgin Frequent Flyer. Dan arndt (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Could you explain the reason for the redirect ? Neither article mentions the other and to me they seem unrelated. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 22:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * - sorry my bad I meant that a mention could be redirected to Virgin frequent flyer. Dan arndt (talk) 00:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, that makes sense. Although in that case one or two sentences about the dog would have to be merged into that section of the airline's article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That's what I was thinking would be the best outcome. Dan arndt (talk) 03:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.