Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peppermint Park (TV series) (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. A third nomination in four months is disruptive. The close of the 2nd nomination properly noted some time should elapse. In this case I would suggest 6 months from the close of the second nomination as a minimum time. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Peppermint Park (TV series)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Among the nine sources in the article:


 * 1 is a patent and trademark listing.
 * 2 and 3 are directory listings from TV magazines that merely confirm the show's existence.
 * 4 only mentions the show in one sentence of an article otherwise dedicated to creepypastas.
 * 5 is an interview where some Z-list celebrity mentions the show in passing as something he was scared of.
 * 6 is some kind of directory listing that doesn't even mention the show at all.
 * 7 and 8 are just listicles from ScreenRant and Cracked that do not cover the show in depth.
 * 9 is a subchannel of a YouTube show and therefore not an RS.

In short, the sources present in the article do not in any way verify any sort of notability. Extensive searching on GBooks, American Radio History, and newspapers.com yielded nothing.

The article was previously prodded, deprodded, and then AFD'ed twice back in December, but both times failed to gather consensus due to lack of participation. As highlighted above, the sources added in the intervening months have done absolutely nothing to assert any semblance of notability. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep: Dude, again? This is the third time you're nominating this article in less than four months. There was a three-hour gap between the first and second AfD, and the last one closed exactly two months ago (Feb 3rd). Sandstein's close said, "The result was no consensus. Again. This renomination was reasonable, but I suggest letting some time pass until the third one." I imagine they meant longer than eight weeks. — Toughpigs (talk) 07:12, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:51, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy close per above. I've sent this to WP:AN. Modernponderer (talk) 14:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.