Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Per R Berger

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 20:51, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Per R Berger
Not notable. I was going to just put this as a speedy delete, but started having doubts as the subject is a mayor. I'm having difficult assessing the notability of this person as I know no Norwegian. As far as I can see, he's simply the mayor of a small town - see. Finbarr Saunders 09:45, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN-vanity. I could write 5 or 6 like that for various people who you've never heard of. CambridgeBayWeather 09:49, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Mayors are encyclopedic. This one has served for six years and is on his second term - he's surely notable enough for a Wikipedia article. However, this was certainly a case of extremly bad and unencyclopedic writing, with a lot of irrelevant information, but I've done a complete rewrite of it now. / Alarm 12:19, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Improperly titled, and mayors are only sometimes in, sometimes not. I wish folks wouldn't extrapolate rules from single debates in the past.  It depends on the mayor, the town, and the biography.  When a person's name (properly spelled and punctuated) is an article title, what is supposed to follow is a biography.  If the person does not have a sufficiently active and meaningful life for people outside of the town to need to know about, then the person should simply be mentioned as "5-time mayor" in the town's article.  Break out the biography when the biography is a valid article.  In this particular case, the mayor should be mentioned elsewhere, and not done as a biography.  Geogre 13:08, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * "Improperly titled" is not grounds for deletion. Punkmorten 20:11, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to article on town, redirect. Mayor of a town of 5,000 people is not inherently notable, but someone wrote it down, so we might as well keep it. Sdedeo 18:43, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Geogre Denni &#9775; 23:08, 2005 September 4 (UTC)
 * Keep. Mayors are inherently notable. Wikipedia is not paper.--Nicodemus75 05:14, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, mention him in article on town as per Geogre. Wikipedia is not toilet paper. Proto t c 13:22, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:Geogre Pilatus 13:33, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Alarm, I demur from your assertion that all mayors are encyclopedic.   What about five house villages?  C'mon, be serious.---CH  (talk) 06:15, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.