Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Per Thure Janson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Per Thure Janson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article created by COI editor on non-notable, obscure Swedish person. Coretheapple (talk) 05:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hästens - which seems to be the only thing why PTJ could remotely be notable; otherwise, delete. Tigraan (talk) 10:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect . Delete (see below). I resent the nominator's implication that being Swedish detracts even further from the (non-existent) notability of an obscure person! But redirecting to Hästens seems the obvious thing to do. Possibly, on a good day, we might "merge" in his vital dates (1864-1926) to where he's mentioned in the Hästens article. Bishonen &#124; talk 00:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC).
 * Sorry, I got mixed up between the generations: there's an article about the actual founder of the company, Pehr Adolf Janson (or there was; not any longer, because I have just redirected it to Hästens) and there's also this article about Per Thure Janson, his descendant. Please delete Per Thure, it doesn't rate a redirect. Per Thure is only parenthetically mentioned in Hästens as being the father of "David" — wait, do we have an article about David? No. Can't think why not. These attempts to inflate the Hästens company into a family of articles are quite pathetic. (I've removed Per Thure from the Hästens article.) Bishonen &#124; talk 00:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC).
 * I was just identifying the chap. I can delete or strike out "Swedish" if you think it wise. Coretheapple (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 06:55, 26 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.