Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perception (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Stargate SG-1: The Alliance. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Perception (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable defunct developer article with no real sources. Suggest a merge to Stargate SG-1: The Alliance. I haven't done a WP:BEFORE due to the infuriatingly vague name. Judging by the current state of the article, the developer never seems to have successfully published a single game on console and only managed two coin-op arcade titles, and the cancelled Stargate SG-1: The Alliance. The studio's entire notability really does just seem to be hinged on the notoriety and controversy for the development of that game. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect Per nom. Basically complete TNT material even assuming the company was notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect Aside from this The Sydney Morning Herald article I found nothing else. Timur9008 (talk) 04:17, January 10, 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom, dont think this can merit its own article. TLA  (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.