Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percolate - Let Your Best Self Filter Through


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Percolate - Let Your Best Self Filter Through

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails Notability (books). Edwardx (talk) 18:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable book. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK. red dogsix (talk) 19:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 'Delete. WP:BOOKCRIT, first criterion wants at least two reviews or other works about the book in reliable sources. The article's sources at present are 1) a listing at "New Consciousness Review (doesn't seem like a WP:RS, 2) an English dictionary definition of the word "percolate" (how helpful), 3) a Publishers Weekly review (that's one good source), and 4) an interview with the author that isn't actually about the book. Not enough to meet BOOKCRIT, it appears. Maybe the author wants to hear my pitch for a sequel: Fine Grind: Espress-o Yourself. No? Anyone? Bueller?  A  Train talk 20:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not finding sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:BKCRIT.  gongshow  talk  06:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete failure to locate sources that meet WP:BOOKCRIT.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.